Senator John Cornyn: can’t take the heat

Posted by Stevious in General, ... | 06.17.2012 - 10:33 am

Up until recently, I followed Senator John Cornyn on Facebook, but his obsession with Attorny General Holder got to be a little much, and as his constituent, I expressed my opinion there. Well, it seems that Senator Cornyn can’t take the heat. I’ve had my Facebook account banned from posting comments on his page, and also had my Twitter account blocked by the Senator’s Twitter account.

The Senator questioned the constitutionality of the Obama administration’s change in deportation policy, and seemed to be saying it was the responsibility of Congress:

Art 1, sec. 8 US Const: Congress shall have the power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization… .”

But the Senator appears far too obsessed and busy pursuing his witch-hunt against Attorney General Holder to spend any time on the Dream Act (or any other worthwhile legislation). He’s posted (some might call it spamming) over 25 links to articles this week calling for the resignation of Attorney General Holder on his Facebook page. Meanwhile, it appears that the charges Cornyn has leveled against Attorney General Holder are unfounded: Five Things To Know About The Republican Witchhunt Against Attorney General Holder.

This comment from Facebook sums it up pretty well:

Lori Ratcliff: I LOVE our president and am so happy that he is doing the right thing in spite of all the corporate shills in the Republican party. I am SO SICK of hearing all the hatred and racism spewing from the mouths (and computers) of Republicans. Never forget, Mr. Cornyn, that it is your job to represent ALL of us, not just your personal supporters. The president is doing the right thing in spite of the congress and I say, it’s about damn time.

Comments Off

Get a free “Queer the Census” sticker!

Posted by Stevious in General, General, ... | 01.04.2010 - 10:16 am

The census is not necessarily the topic you’ve been waiting to hear about, I know, but bear with me for a moment.

It’s coming up in March or April, and while it’s supposed to be an accurate count of everyone in the country, there’s no question that asks if someone is lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.

This is a huge problem. The data collected has a direct impact on issues that are critical to every American–issues like health care, economic stability, safety. And when LGBT people are not counted, individuals, families, and communities suffer.

The good news is that we can change this. Show your support of a census that counts everyone–say it right on your census envelope with your free Queer the Census sticker! And make sure to sign the petition telling the Census Bureau to make sure everyone is counted.

http://act.credoaction.com/sticker/queerthecensus?r_by=-2551005-fe3f12x&rc=taf.stickers

Comments Off

Oh, what a tangled web we weave…

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 04.13.2007 - 9:32 am

The US Attorney firing thing gets curiouser and curiouser as more information about it comes to light. Check out this article in the Boston Globe:

Scandal puts spotlight on Christian law school
Grads influential in Justice Dept.

By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | April 8, 2007

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. — The title of the course was Constitutional Law, but the subject was sin. Before any casebooks were opened, a student led his classmates in a 10-minute devotional talk, completed with “amens,” about the need to preserve their Christian values.

“Sin is so appealing because it’s easy and because it’s fun,” the law student warned.

Regent University School of Law, founded by televangelist Pat Robertson to provide “Christian leadership to change the world,” has worked hard in its two-decade history to upgrade its reputation, fighting past years when a majority of its graduates couldn’t pass the bar exam and leading up to recent victories over Ivy League teams in national law student competitions.

But even in its darker days, Regent has had no better friend than the Bush administration. Graduates of the law school have been among the most influential of the more than 150 Regent University alumni hired to federal government positions since President Bush took office in 2001, according to a university website.

One of those graduates is Monica Goodling , the former top aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who is at the center of the storm over the firing of US attorneys. Goodling, who resigned on Friday, has become the face of Regent overnight — and drawn a harsh spotlight to the administration’s hiring of officials educated at smaller, conservative schools with sometimes marginal academic reputations.

Documents show that Goodling, who has asserted her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to avoid testifying before Congress, was one of a handful of officials overseeing the firings. She helped install Timothy Griffin , the Karl Rove aide and her former boss at the Republican National Committee, as a replacement US attorney in Arkansas.

Because Goodling graduated from Regent in 1999 and has scant prosecutorial experience, her qualifications to evaluate the performance of US attorneys have come under fire. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, asked at a hearing: “Should we be concerned with the experience level of the people who are making these highly significant decisions?”

And across the political blogosphere, critics have held up Goodling, who declined to be interviewed, as a prime example of the Bush administration subordinating ability to politics in hiring decisions.

“It used to be that high-level DOJ jobs were generally reserved for the best of the legal profession,” wrote a contributor to The New Republic website . “. . . That a recent graduate of one of the very worst (and sketchiest) law schools with virtually no relevant experience could ascend to this position is a sure sign that there is something seriously wrong at the DOJ.”

Boston Globe

Freedom is the distance between church and state

From Campaign to Defend the Constitution (defconamerica.org)

The recent scandal surrounding the Justice Department’s firing of several US attorneys has inadvertently revealed the dangerous influence the religious right wields over the current administration. While the media is focused on the political firings of these attorneys, the connection between the administration and Pat Robertson’s Regent University — which has seen over 150 graduates hired by the Bush administration in recent years — is a more worrisome reality.

In today’s New York Times, Paul Krugman acknowledges the danger the religious right poses to our nation. Krugman exposes how these “extremists” have long sought to merge their ideology with government policy, a reality that we understand all too well. He also points out just how little attention this serious threat to democracy has received from mainstream media:

“The infiltration of the federal government by large numbers of people seeking to impose a religious agenda — which is very different from simply being people of faith — is one of the most important stories of the last six years. It’s also a story that tends to go underreported, perhaps because journalists are afraid of sounding like conspiracy theorists. But this conspiracy is no theory”.

DefCon was founded to fight this influence and restore our nation’s commitment to freedom, science, and progress — not theocracy. Revelations like those shown by this scandal not only reveal the seriousness of this threat but more importantly how critical our campaign remains.

Please take a moment to forward this news on to your friends and family, encouraging them to join our campaign for freedom, science, and equality. If you’re not already a DefCon member, click here to sign up and receive news and updates.

Comments Off

I wonder if they’re looking for a new mail server admin?

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 04.12.2007 - 1:00 pm

Or did they mean to “lose” FIVE MILLION e-mails?

BREAKING: White House lost Over FIVE MILLION e-mails in two year period

Submitted by crew on 12 April 2007 – 2:27pm.
Today, CREW issued a new report, WITHOUT A TRACE: The Missing White House Emails and Violations of the PRA, and made the shocking new disclosure that the Bush White House has lost over FIVE MILLION e-mails in a two year period. The report also details the legal issues behind the growing controversy over the White House e-mail scandal.

Through two confidential sources, CREW learned that the Executive Office of the President (EOP) has lost over FIVE MILLION emails generated between March 2003 and October 2005.

CREW

Comments Off

Bush aides’ use of GOP e-mail probed

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 04.11.2007 - 8:52 pm

Is this like using gmail for company business?

By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer Wed Apr 11, 6:50 PM ET

WASHINGTON – The White House said Wednesday it had mishandled Republican Party-sponsored e-mail accounts used by nearly two dozen presidential aides, resulting in the loss of an undetermined number of e-mails concerning official White House business. (what does this delete button do?) wtf

Congressional investigators looking into the administration’s firing of eight federal prosecutors already had the nongovernmental e-mail accounts in their sights because some White House aides used them to help plan the U.S. attorneys’ ouster. Democrats were questioning whether the use of the GOP-provided e-mail accounts was proof that the firings were political.

Democrats also have been asking if White House officials are purposely conducting sensitive official presidential business via nongovernmental accounts to get around a law requiring preservation — and eventual disclosure — of presidential records. The announcement of the lost e-mails — a rare admission of error from the Bush White House at a delicate time for the administration’s relations with Democratically controlled Capitol Hill — gave new fodder for inquiry on this front.

“This sounds like the administration’s version of the dog ate my homework,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. “I am deeply disturbed that just when this administration is finally subjected to meaningful oversight, it cannot produce the necessary information.”

Yahoo!

Comments Off

It certainly doesn’t make him an overnight success…

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 01.29.2007 - 9:25 am

Google Halts ‘Miserable Failure’ Link to President Bush

Google announced on Thursday on its official blog that “by improving our analysis of the link structure of the Web” such mischief would instead “typically return commentary, discussions, and articles” about the tactic itself.

New York Times

I can’t imagine who would have thought that this particular Google bomb represented the opinion of Google, but…

Comments Off

Why it’s OK for Rosie to critisize the President

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 01.28.2007 - 11:32 am

I was channel surfing while driving home Thursday of last week, and heard a conversation between the DJs on Austin’s Mix 94.7 and a caller complaining about Rosie voicing her opinion on “The View”. I guess she was calling for the impeachment of President George W. Bush. The caller suggested, and it seems that the DJs agreed, that Rosie should just “shut up”.

This quote from Unclaimed Territory on Public servant v. Military Commander is timely.

While President Bush’s supporters are fond of referring to him as the “commander in chief” — typically to insinuate that he should be beyond criticism or that his authority cannot be questioned, particularly in “times of war” — the president under our system of government holds that position only with regard to those in the armed forces (see Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: “The president shall be Commander in Chief *of the Army and Navy of the United States*”). With regard to Americans generally, the president is not our “commander” but instead our elected public servant, subject to the mandates of the law like every other citizen and subordinate to the will of the people.

He works for us, we pay his salary! Hell yea, we can bitch about the job he’s doing!

The only thing worse than Rosie offering her opinion, would be Rosie being silenced from offering her opinion! Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one’s opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. Regardless of whether you agree with her or not, the fact that she can voice her ideas openly lets you know where she stands on the issue, and you can certainly choose to change the channel… or not.

Comments Off

Another Bush-ism, or intentional smear?

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 01.24.2007 - 9:05 am

In the SOTU address last night, Bush used the word “Democrat” as an adjective — “Democrat Party”. It’s fairly obvious that this usage is meant as a slur. Media Matters for America has a lengthy article on the topic as 60 Minutes journalists are guilty of this misuse as well.

A usage that, as Media Matters for America has noted repeatedly, is one that originated with Republican operatives. Republicans consistently refer to the “Democrat Party,” even though that is not what members of the Democratic Party call themselves, and use the noun “Democrat” as an adjective, which New Yorker magazine senior editor Hendrik Hertzberg identified as an attempt to deny the opposing party the claim to being “democratic,” or as Hertzberg wrote, “to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation.”

In the early 1990s, apparently due largely to the urging of then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) and Republican pollster Frank Luntz, the use of the word “Democrat” as an adjective became near-universal among Republicans.

Hertzberg pointed out in an article for the August 7 issue of The New Yorker that the word “Democrat” is a noun, arguing that its use as an adjective defies the rules of English grammar:

The American Heritage College Dictionary, for example, defines the noun “Democratic Party” as “One of the two major US political parties, owing its origin to a split in the Democratic-Republican Party under Andrew Jackson in 1828.” (It defines “Democrat n” as “A Democratic Party member” and “Democratic adj” as “Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Democratic Party,” but gives no definition for — indeed, makes no mention of — “Democrat Party n” or “Democrat adj”.) Other dictionaries, and reference works generally, appear to be unanimous on these points.

Hertzberg further noted:

There’s no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. “Democrat Party” is a slur, or intended to be — a handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but “Democrat Party” is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams “rat.”

Comments Off

This Modern World: Young Republicans want to help!

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 01.20.2007 - 1:38 am

Comments Off

Birds of a feather: Crooks and Liars

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 01.09.2007 - 9:14 am

abramoff-bush.jpg

Comments Off

Tom DeLay gets hammered in the blogosphere

Posted by Stevious in General, General, Ge... | 12.10.2006 - 11:28 pm

Seems that Tom DeLay started up a blog, got hammered in the comments section and had to shut it down, all within about 75 minutes. Sorry Tom, you’re a has been.

The good news is that somebody captured the comment activity before Tom wiped out both the posts and the comments. Check it out here for a good laugh. Tom DeLay; the new football of the blogosphere.

shit

Update: Oops, they left a couple of items still open for comments, and comments are still rolling in… http://www.tomdelay.com/recent-appearances/2006/12/8/hannity-colmes.html#comments

Comments Off

Next Page »
Austin Contractors
Add this box to your siteAustin Contractors



Deal of the Day

BlogRoll

Get Firefox!

Disclaimer: The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent the positions, strategies or opinions of my employer.

Austin Contractors
Add this box to your siteAustin Contractors



Deal of the Day

BlogRoll

Get Firefox!

Disclaimer: The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent the positions, strategies or opinions of my employer.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1105 access attempts in the last 7 days.